Auflistung nach Autor:in "Busch, Rainer"
1 - 3 von 3
Treffer pro Seite
Sortieroptionen
- TextdokumentModel-in-the-Loop and Software-in-the-Loop Testing of Closed-Loop Automotive Software with Arttest(INFORMATIK 2017, 2017) Hansen, Norman; Wiechowski, Norbert; Kugler, Alexander; Kowalewski, Stefan; Rambow, Thomas; Busch, RainerIn this paper, we present Arttest, a tool for functional testing of block diagrams developed with MATLAB/Simulink. We introduce testing concepts for closed-loop tests of automotive software on model and software level, the integration of the concepts into a signal specification language and correspondent tool support. Furthermore, we show the applicability of the concepts and the test execution automation based on an example for model-in-the-loop and software-in-the-loop tests.
- ZeitschriftenartikelProjektmanagement für objektorientierte Software-Entwicklung - Editorial(Informatik Spektrum: Vol. 15, No. 5, 1992) Busch, Rainer
- KonferenzbeitragTowards the Use of Controlled Natural Languages in Hazard Analysis and Risk Assessment(Automotive - Safety & Security 2017 - Sicherheit und Zuverlässigkeit für automobile Informationstechnik, 2017) Chomicz, Paul; Müller-Lerwe, Armin; Wegner, Götz-Philipp; Busch, Rainer; Kowalewski, StefanNew safety-critical and software-controlled systems of automobiles have to be developed according to the functional safety standard ISO 26262. A hazard analysis and risk assessment has to be performed for such systems. The sub-activities of this analysis technique are defined by the standard, but informative definitions leave room for subjective variation, and documentation details are left to the car manufacturer. Usually, natural languages are used for the documentation, which are powerful and expressive but also complex and ambiguous. We propose the usage of controlled natural languages for the documentation of the results of the hazard analysis and risk assessment. In a first step, we developed a controlled natural language for the description of the hazardous events. The language reduces ambiguity and improves the consistency across hazard analyses and risk as- sessments.